Defensive Ends
The scouts are seeing green! No, they're not jealous, they're just
excited about Ed and Derek, the top two defensive ends in this draft.
This is a deep, talented group. The deepest in several seasons.
|
|
|
DE Ed Green HoF
Fumble recoveries: 7 Tackles: 252 Sacks: 66, 1 safety
Pros: Fast, quick and powerful, Green has everything you need in a
starting end.
Great conditioning and plenty of football starts too. His production
compares well
with Jerel Jennings and Johnpaul Grogan, who were both solid first
rounders last
season.
Cons: Tends to freelance at times.
Conclusion: Green should be a lock to go in the first round.
|
|
|
DE Derek Green HoF
Interceptions: 1 for 1 return yard, 1 longest Fumble recoveries: 6 Tackles: 198 Sacks: 51
Pros: Even quicker than Ed Green but slightly less athletic. Good power
and
conditioning.
Cons: Serious lack of discipline is this player's biggest weakness, and
it may
show in the fact that he has substantially lower sack numbers than Ed
Green.
Conclusion: Second round prospect who could be a solid starter.
|
|
|
DE Al Moschetti
Fumble recoveries: 2, 1 TD Tackles: 199 Sacks: 50
Pros: Power end with plenty of quickness and more than enough speed and
athleticism. Very well-conditioned athlete. Made some big plays and
found the end
zone.
Cons: Lacks football smarts. Production was solid but not elite.
Conclusion: Moschetti doesn't look like a star, but he looks like a
player. He's a
second round prospect.
|
|
|
DE James Bouie
Fumble recoveries: 8, 2 TD Tackles: 174 Sacks: 47, 2 safeties
Pros: This guy has absolutely all the physical tools. Two scores isn't
half bad
for an end.
Cons: Really needs to work in the film room and play within the scheme.
Conclusion: If he can learn the game at the pro level Bouie appears to
have some
star qualities. Get him in the second round.
|
|
|
DE Kyle Fuller HoF
Interceptions: 1 for 16 return yards, 16 longest Fumble recoveries: 1 Tackles: 188 Sacks: 62, 1 safety
Pros: Very productive pass rusher with great speed and mental game.
Plenty quick
enough and a fine athlete.
Cons: Badly needs to work on his conditioning. Strength is just north of
average.
Conclusion: Fuller should be a second round selection, but concerns
about his
ability to play a full game could push him lower.
|
|
|
Dark horse pick: Preston Price, who is 40th all-time in career sacks. An
athletic end rather than a bruiser. NPLCAA Hall of Fame member.
|
|
Defensive Tackles
I imagine that the scouts get just a little weak in the knees and let
out a wistful sigh each time there's a new crop of defensive tackles to
rank. This season, as most years, it's true love. The top two players
overall and four of the top twelve are DTs. However, on stats alone none
of these tackles have had especially distinguished careers, with Troy
Risha leading the way in a tie for 43rd on the all-time sack list.
That's not to say they're bums, but it is to say proceed with caution.
In terms of production none of these guys was Ken Scott or Alfred Wollam.
|
|
|
DT Troy Risha HoF
Fumble recoveries: 1 Tackles: 210 Sacks: 62, 1 safety
Pros: A practically perfect player in the scouts' eyes. The Mary Poppins
of
defensive tackles if you will.
Cons: Where's the flaw with this guy? He could have more impressive
production in
terms of big plays, but he wasn't too shabby.
Conclusion: The scouts tell you this is your top prospect. He should be
a first
rounder, though I doubt he'll be the first player taken.
|
|
|
DT Adlai Dyson HoF
Interceptions: 1 for 2 return yards, 2 longest Fumble recoveries: 3 Tackles: 212 Sacks: 57
Pros: Nearly as perfect as Risha and nearly as productive. The Sherry
Bobbins of
defensive tackles if you will. Got fewer sacks and no safeties but
scooped up more
fumbles than Risha.
Cons: Could be slightly better conditioned and more disciplined.
Conclusion: The scouts say he's the second best player in the draft. I
say that's
probably hyperbolic, but he should be a first rounder anyhow.
|
|
|
DT Danny Brown
Interceptions: 1 for -2 return yards, -2 longest Fumble recoveries: 3 Tackles: 134 Sacks: 48, 1 safety
Pros: Has all the physical tools. Just a little less perfect than Dyson.
Cons: Discipline is a noticible shortcoming, though it doesn't seem to
have
stopped him from getting picks, sacks, safeties and fumble recoveries.
Not as
productive as the top two tackles.
Conclusion: The scouts say he's a first round prospect. I say that's
unlikely,
though not impossible. He should be gone by the end of the second.
|
|
|
DT Giradie Boddie HoF
Fumble recoveries: 2 Tackles: 173 Sacks: 60, 1 safety
Pros: Second-best sack numbers of the top DTs. Has nearly all elite
physical
tools, and a sharp mental game to boot.
Cons: Seriously lacking in quickness. How did he get those sacks?
Conclusion: Guess what? The scouts think he's a first rounder. Maybe,
but I'm
thinking a second rounder.
|
|
|
DT Wilson Pragalz
Fumble recoveries: 1 Tackles: 110 Sacks: 40, 1 safety
Pros: Well-suited to playing in the middle in terms of athleticism.
Smart and
well-conditioned.
Cons: Not a massive player for the middle, and may or may not be quick
enough to
consistently shoot the gaps. May be destined to be a career backup. Not
nearly as
productive as the top players at this position.
Conclusion: Late second round prospect.
|
|
|
Dark horse pick: Jason Mayberry, a steady if unspectacular performer and
NPLCAA
Hall of Fame member who snuck onto the career sack list at number 178.
|
|
Linebackers
The talent is at the top at the linebacker position, but what a talent!
After Wayne Robinson is taken off the board, there may be no other
backers taken until the third round, so get your future hall-of-famer
early if you need him.
|
|
|
LB Wayne Robinson
Interceptions: 5 for 36 return yards, 13 longest Fumble recoveries: 6 Tackles: 534 Sacks: 75, 2 safeties
Pros: Tops in career tackles and fourteenth in career sacks. Made loads
of big
plays. Has all the physical tools.
Cons: Maybe could be a little quicker, but it's hard to see the chinks
in his
armor. I suppose you could complain that he didn't score any TDs.
Conclusion: Forget what the scouts say about the defensive tackles. This
is your
first overall pick. Robinson has impact player written all over him.
|
|
|
LB Tony Buggs
Interceptions: 3 for 18 return yards, 15 longest Fumble recoveries: 8, 2 TD Tackles: 366 Sacks: 54, 1 safety
Pros: Fine athlete who doesn't freelance or make too many mistakes.
Powerful
tackler. Productive and made some big plays, including some scores.
Cons: Could be a bit faster and in somewhat better condition, but these
are not
particularly glaring flaws. Not the greatest hands, but he's a
linebacker, not a
safety.
Conclusion: Buggs projects to the middle third round but could go
earlier if teams
need bodies at linebacker.
|
|
|
LB Anthony Veach
Fumble recoveries: 3 Tackles: 269 Sacks: 22
Pros: An above average athlete with elite quickness and sufficient
speed. Great
conditioning.
Cons: Feather-light hitter who failed to register many sacks. Could use
more time
in the film room.
Conclusion: Veach projects to the fifth round.
|
|
|
LB Rod Deligianis
Interceptions: 4 for 38 return yards, 11 longest Tackles: 348 Sacks: 70, 1 safety
Pros: Fast, explosive 'backer who used that athleticism to the tune of
70 sacks.
That's big-time production. Solid tackler.
Cons: Conditioning could be better though still above average. Not a
great student
of the game.
Conclusion: Deligianis slots in as a fifth-round prospect, but on the
strength of
his sack ability alone I bet he'll go sooner.
|
|
|
LB Bobby Moore
Interceptions: 10 for 145 return yards, 51 longest Fumble recoveries: 4 Tackles: 422 Sacks: 29, 1 safety
Pros: Lots of picks for a linebacker. Plenty of speed and athleticism.
Sound
conditioning.
Cons: More of a coverage player than a rush linebacker, though those
hands aren't
great. Needs to improve his mental game to be an impact player in NPL.
Conclusion: Projects as a seventh rounder and should be a pleasant
surprise taken
in that round. However, I think he'll go sooner.
|
|
|
Dark horse pick: : Frank McDaniels, NPLCAA's all-time sack leader among
LBs and
5th overall among all players. NPLCAA Hall of Fame member
|
|
Cornerbacks
This isn't the greatest NPLCAA class in the secondary, if the scouts are
on their game. However in Eric Lopez and Bernardo Usu this class has two
corners who should be able to step in and play sooner rather than later.
|
|
|
CB Eric Lopez
Interceptions: 4 for 97 return yards, 52 longest Fumble recoveries: 2, 1 TD Tackles: 297 Sacks: 2, 1 safety
Pros: Elite quickness and man coverage ability. Soft hands, hard hits.
Great
conditioning. Good production including some scores.
Cons: Mental game is just barely above average and lacks truly elite
speed.
Conclusion: The scouts see him as a third-round prospect, though it
would be
highly unlikely to see no corners taken until then. On scouting
evaluations alone,
his quickness, conditioning and hands give him an edge over Usu to be
the first
corner taken, though the two are neck-and-neck.
|
|
|
CB Bernardo Usu
Interceptions: 8 for 192 return yards, 63 longest, 1 TD Fumble recoveries: 1 Tackles: 262 Sacks: 6
Pros: Lots of college interceptions and a score. Fine man coverage
player and a
solid hitter for a corner. Fine conditioning. Plays within the scheme.
Cons: Lacks truly elite speed and quickness. Could have softer hands,
though that
doesn't seem to have kept him from racking up picks. Could spend a
little more
time studying film.
Conclusion: The scouts see him as a third-round prospect, though it
would be
highly unlikely to see no corners taken until then. On stats alone I
prefer him
slightly to Lopez, though the two are neck-and-neck.
|
|
|
CB Joe Robinson
Interceptions: 7 for 220 return yards, 62 longest, 1 TD Tackles: 224 Sacks: 3
Pros: You can hardly fault Robinson's productivity. He has good man
coverage
skills and great condtioning.
Cons: Lacks the blazing speed and quickness you want in a starting
corner. Gets
taken in too often on fakes.
Conclusion: Robinson appears to be a late fourth or early fifth round
prospect.
Given the need for coverage players, he could go sooner.
|
|
|
CB Sir Miller
Interceptions: 2 for 23 return yards, 22 longest Fumble recoveries: 1 Tackles: 213 Sacks: 5
Pros: Very sound athlete and reliable tackler. Fine conditioning.
Cons: There's nothing elite about Miller. He lacks the speed you want
for a
starter, and he tends to freelance. He may give up some big plays and
draw
penalties.
Conclusion: Fifth round prospect.
|
|
|
CB Donnel Ryans
Interceptions: 5 for 70 return yards, 23 longest KO Returns: 1 return, -1 yards, -1 longest Fumble recoveries: 5, 1 TD Tackles: 231
Pros: Productive player who got some scores and made an impact. Fast
enough and
good enough athlete. Sound tackler.
Cons: Not an elite athlete, and definitely needs to spend time watching
film.
Conclusion: The scouts see him as a sixth rounder. I think he'll go
sooner.
|
|
|
Dark horse pick: Brandon Ah You, winner of the Lemony Jack Lubowski Best
Name
AwardŽ. He also has the basic coverage skills to play some corner, even
if he may
be too congenitally stupid to find the stadium.
|
|
Safeties
This group has no obvious stars, but it offers a handful of mid-round
prospects who may be able to contribute over the long haul.
|
|
|
S Juaquin Graham
Interceptions: 6 for 99 return yards, 42 longest, 1 TD Fumble recoveries: 3, 1 TD Tackles: 285 Sacks: 2, 1 safety
Pros: Good production. Scored touchdowns and a safety. Productive player
overall.
Great hands.
Cons: Not an elite player. His lack of speed and explosiveness may
render him a
zone-only player in NPL.
Conclusion: Fourth round prospect.
|
|
|
S Avery Robinson
Interceptions: 3 for 49 return yards, 19 longest, 1 TD KO Returns: 1 return, 2 yards, 2 longest Fumble recoveries: 2 Tackles: 219 Sacks: 6
Pros: Great speed and explosiveness. Nice hands.
Cons: Needs to hit the film room. Lacks top man coverage skills. Not as
productive
as Graham for all his athleticism.
Conclusion: Fourth round prospect who could go sooner to a team needing
help at
the position.
|
|
|
S Johndale Mason
Interceptions: 7 for 152 return yards, 63 longest, 2 TD Fumble recoveries: 5 Tackles: 222 Sacks: 3
Pros: Sufficient speed and quickness. Fine conditioning. Hard hitter.
Made plenty
of plays in college.
Cons: Little skill at man coverage. Slightly subpar student of the game.
Conclusion: Sixth round prospect, though with his production I think
he'll be off
the board well before then.
|
|
|
S Corey Ponder
Interceptions: 1 for 59 return yards, 59 longest, 1 TD Tackles: 142 Sacks: 5
Pros: Sufficient speed and outstanding quickness. Solid tackler and
well-
conditioned athlete. Scored a touchdown (on his only college pick).
Cons: Lacks soft hands and man coverage skills. Not nearly as productive
as the
top players at the position.
Conclusion: Seventh round prospect.
|
|
|
S Tony Maddox
Interceptions: 2 for 41 return yards, 39 longest KO Returns: 1 return, 3 yards, 3 longest Tackles: 265 Sacks: 2
Pros: Racked up lots of tackles. Very quick.
Cons: Just barely above average speed, coverage ability, conditioning.
Needs work
in the film room.
Conclusion: Seventh round prospect.
|
|
|
Dark horse pick: Patrick Grant, who may need a bit of luck to even be
drafted.
|
|
Kickers
|
|
|
K Gary Fife Barney's younger brother isn't too bright, but he has a heck of a leg, Brownie! |
|
|
K Bennie Riley
Riley brings better athleticism and mental game than Fife, at the cost of a
slightly weaker leg. 73.4% career on FGs to Fife's 65.2% mark. Both pale
in
comparison to number three kicker Jr. Stephens's 74.4% mark. Stephens
also hit on
nearly 90% of his PAT attempts. Who was this writeup about again?
|
|
|
|
|
Punters
|
|
|
P Johnny Nguyen
|
|
|
P Darren Taylor
Gerald Moss and Matt Michael out-punted Taylor, but the scouts love Taylor. Is it for his EN?
|
|
|
|